Wednesday, December 13, 2006

their lies unravel

Armed police officer on duty at UK airport
The alleged plot prompted a massive security clampdown
A Pakistani judge has ruled there is not enough evidence to try a key suspect in an alleged airline bomb plot on terrorism charges.

He has moved the case of Rashid Rauf, a Briton, from an anti-terrorism court to a regular court, where he faces lesser charges such as forgery.

Pakistan has presented Mr Rauf as one of the ringleaders behind the alleged plan to blow up flights out of London.

The British authorities say they foiled it with Pakistan's help in August.

'Explosives'

The arrest of Rashid Rauf in Pakistan triggered arrests in the UK of a number of suspects allegedly plotting to blow up transatlantic flights.

The Pakistani authorities described him as a key figure.

But an anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi found no evidence that he had been involved in terrorist activities or that he belonged to a terrorist organisation.

As well as forgery charges, Mr Rauf has also been charged with carrying explosives.

But his lawyer says police evidence amounts only to bottles of hydrogen peroxide found in his possession.

Hydrogen peroxide is a disinfectant that can be used for bomb-making if other chemicals are added.

'Suspected conspiracy'

In August, the British government requested the extradition of Mr Rauf, a Briton of Pakistani origin, in connection with a murder committed in 2002.

Scotland Yard declined to discuss which murder case the request related to.

The government in Pakistan, which has no extradition treaty with the UK, said it was considering the request.

Rashid Rauf was arrested in Pakistan earlier that month over the alleged plot to blow up US-bound aircraft, Pakistan's foreign ministry said.

He has been described by Pakistan's government as a "key person" in the "suspected conspiracy"


Interesting...very interesting. Also notice how, just as was the case with Mhd Abdul Kahar (Forest gate) and the late Mr Menezes (Stockwell), they follow up their blunders with slanderoous and/or fallacious statements. They want to question Mr Rauf in connection with a murder in 2002....yeah right.

Elsewhere the oppressive police in the UK were given a bloody nose by the House of Lords for violating the right of freedom of expression and lawful assembly

Source: BBC (again)

1 Comments:

At 7:39 p.m., Blogger Nazia said...

This comes jsut a few weeks after two of the brothers who WERE charged in relation to this case were released due to lack of evidence and (Alhumdulillah) i know of many other cases where all the charges are being dropped one by one!

Is it me or does something not add up with many Anti-terror cases...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home